Title page for ETD etd-08232011-172249

Type of Document Dissertation
Author Mishra, Anurag
Author's Email Address mishranurag@gmail.com
URN etd-08232011-172249
Title Estimating Uncertainty in HSPF based Water Quality Model: Application of Monte-Carlo Based Techniques
Degree PhD
Department Biological Systems Engineering
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Benham, Brian L. Committee Chair
Gallagher, Daniel L. Committee Member
Reckhow, Kenneth H. Committee Member
Smith, Eric P. Committee Member
Wolfe, Mary Leigh Committee Member
  • water quality modeling
  • TMDL
  • fecal coliform
  • HSPF
  • uncertainty analysis
  • Monte-Carlo
  • Bayesian techniques
  • GLUE
  • MCMC
  • two-phase Monte Carlo analysis
Date of Defense 2011-07-28
Availability unrestricted
To propose a methodology for the uncertainty estimation in water quality modeling as related to TMDL development, four Monte Carlo (MC) based techniques—single-phase MC, two-phase MC, Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) —were applied to a Hydrological Simulation Program–FORTRAN (HSPF) model developed for the Mossy Creek bacterial TMDL in Virginia. Predictive uncertainty in percent violations of instantaneous fecal coliform concentration criteria for the prediction period under two TMDL pollutant allocation scenarios was estimated. The average percent violations of the applicable water quality criteria were less than 2% for all the evaluated techniques. Single-phase MC reported greater uncertainty in percent violations than the two-phase MC for one of the allocation scenarios. With the two-phase MC, it is computationally expensive to sample the complete parameter space, and with increased simulations, the estimates of single and two-phase MC may be similar. Two-phase MC reported significantly greater effect of knowledge uncertainty than stochastic variability on uncertainty estimates. Single and two-phase MC require manual model calibration as opposed to GLUE and MCMC that provide a framework to obtain posterior or calibrated parameter distributions based on a comparison between observed and simulated data and prior parameter distributions. Uncertainty estimates using GLUE and MCMC were similar when GLUE was applied following the log-transformation of observed and simulated FC concentrations. GLUE provides flexibility in selecting any model goodness of fit criteria for calculating the likelihood function and does not make any assumption about the distribution of residuals, but this flexibility is also a controversial aspect of GLUE. MCMC has a robust formulation that utilizes a statistical likelihood function, and requires normal distribution of model errors. However, MCMC is computationally expensive to apply in a watershed modeling application compared to GLUE. Overall, GLUE is the preferred approach among all the evaluated uncertainty estimation techniques, for the application of watershed modeling as related to bacterial TMDL development. However, the application of GLUE in watershed-scale water quality modeling requires further research to evaluate the effect of different likelihood functions, and different parameter set acceptance/rejection criteria.
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  Mishra_A_D_2011.pdf 2.24 Mb 00:10:22 00:05:20 00:04:40 00:02:20 00:00:11
  Mishra_A_D_2011_Fairuse.pdf 748.53 Kb 00:03:27 00:01:46 00:01:33 00:00:46 00:00:03

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

dla home
etds imagebase journals news ereserve special collections
virgnia tech home contact dla university libraries

If you have questions or technical problems, please Contact DLA.