Communications Project

Document Type:Dissertation
Name:Kendra Stahle Boggess
Title:Ethical Issues in Business Communication: A Comparative Study of the Perceptions of Japanese and US Students
Degree:Doctor of Philosophy
Department:EDVT, Vocational, Technical Education
Committee Chair: B. June Schmidt
Committee Members:Susan B. Asselin
Curtis R. Finch
Martin C. Schnitzer
Daisy L. Stewart
Keywords:Cultural typology models, Cultural Beliefs, Cultural Behaviors, Business Ethics, Vignettes
Date of defense:October 13, 1997
Availability:Release the entire work for Virginia Tech access only.
After one year release worldwide only with written permission of the student and the advisory committee chair.




Kendra Stahle Boggess

Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy


Vocational and Technical Education

B. June Schmidt, Chair

Susan. B. Asselin

Curtis R. Finch

Martin C. Schnitzer

Daisy L. Stewart

October 13, 1997

Blacksburg, Virginia

Key Words: Cultural Typology Models, Cultural Beliefs, Cultural Behaviors, Business Ethics, Vignettes

Ethical Issues in Business Communication:

A Comparative Study of the Perceptions

of Japanese and US Students

Kendra Stahle Boggess


This study compared Japanese and US students' intended beliefs and behaviors relating to ethical business decisions. The study assessed the extent to which three of Hofstede's (1984) cultural indexes related to three ethical classifications of Vitell, Nwachukwu, and Barnes (1993). Participants were 79 US and 33 Japanese students attending West Virginia colleges and universities, representing a response rate of 30.7%.

A set of six vignettes were written to portray subtly unethical business situations. The vignettes were reviewed by two expert panels, and pilot tested on students similar to those participating in the study. Quantitative techniques were used to analyze survey results. Some moderate correlations were found when determining the nature and degree of relationships among Belief and Behavior scores. A chi square analysis was used to determine significant differences between US and Japanese students' demographic characteristics. Means and standards deviations revealed higher scores for Japanese students on all measures for Belief and Behavior questions. These scores indicated that they believed each vignette portrayed a more ethical situation, and that they would more likely engage in such behavior than would US students. ANOVAs were used to examine differences between Japanese and US studentsí responses to the vignettes, revealing significant differences between groups, but not as Hofstede's dimensions predicted.

Findings on Hofstede's (1984) Individualism versus Collectivism dimension indicate that the theory that members of Japanese cultures will be more willing to work for organizational than personal gain, may not be true, particularly for students. Hofstede's Uncertainty Avoidance dimension, suggesting that members of the Japanese culture will be less comfortable with uncertainty than will members of the US culture, was not supported either. Finally, Hofstede's Masculinity/Femininity dimension, theorizing that members of the Japanese culture are more comfortable with traditional masculine values, was supported.

The major finding of this study is that present-day students did not react to Hofstede's assumptions as expected. Use of different subject groups than Hofstede's and the span of thirty years between his study and this one may have impacted the outcomes. Educators and members of the business community involved with training may find the results of this study helpful. The findings encourage educators and trainers to avoid stereotyping learners' abilities based upon culture or the specifications of cultural typology models.

List of Attached Files

CH3122.PDF CH4122.PDF CH5122.PDF
ETD122.PDF vita122.pdf

At the author's request, all materials (PDF files, images, etc.) associated with this ETD are accessible from the Virginia Tech network only.

The author grants to Virginia Tech or its agents the right to archive and display their thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University Libraries in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. The author retains all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. The author also retains the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.