Scholarly Communications Project

<ETD> Submission Form - Cataloger

Sydha Salihu

Email address:

BASIS FOR SELECTIVITY OF ISOXABEN IN AJUGA (Ajuga reptans), WINTERCREEPER (Euonymus fortunei), AND DWARF BURNING BUSH (Euonymus alatus 'Compacta')

Date of defense:
May 1, 1997

Document Type:
PhD Dissertation

Doctor of Philosophy

Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science


Isoxaben is a preemergence herbicide used for broadleaf weed control in turf and ornamentals. Although isoxaben can be used on a number of ornamentals, certain species are injured by isoxaben applications. The objectives of this research were: a) to evaluate the tolerance of ajuga, wintercreeper and dwarf burning bush to isoxaben applications, b) to compare the absorption, translocation and metabolism of isoxaben following root and shoot application in these ornamentals, and c) to examine the effect of isoxaben on glucose incorporation in the roots of these species. Greenhouse and lathhouse studies demonstrated that ajuga was the most sensitive species compared to wintercreeper and dwarf burning bush following root and shoot exposure to isoxaben at 0.84, 1.69 and 3.39 kg ai/ha. Following root and shoot application, isoxaben at 3.39 kg/ha caused approximately 50% shoot injury in ajuga at 2 months after treatment compared to approximately 30% in dwarf burning bush in sand culture. Wintercreeper was not visually injured by any isoxaben rate. Isoxaben at 3.39 kg/ha reduced wintercreeper root weight by 15% following root application and shoot weight by 10% following shoot application. Field studies showed that isoxaben applications made one month after bud-break caused 30 to 45% injury to dwarf burning bush. However, the plants outgrew the injury in the following year. Dwarf burning bush was not injured from applications of isoxaben made at the dormant stage or two months after the bud-break stage. Studies with root-applied radiolabeled isoxaben showed that ajuga and dwarf burning bush had absorbed 34 and 41% of the applied radioactivity, respectively, while wintercreeper had absorbed only 21% at 14 days after treatment (DAT). The percent of absorbed radioactivity which translocated was greater in ajuga (58%) and wintercreeper (50%) than in dwarf burning bush (28%). In the root extracts, metabolism of isoxaben was greater in ajuga than wintercreeper or dwarf burning bush at 3, 7 and 14 DAT. Most of the radioactivity recovered from the shoots of the three species appeared to be polar metabolites of isoxaben, possibly conjugates. In studies with shoot-applied radiolabeled isoxaben, radioactivity recovered from the treated leaf of ajuga increased from 46% of applied at 3 days to 64% at 14 days after treatment. In wintercreeper, the most tolerant species, approximately 40% of the applied radioactivity was recovered in the treated leaf at each harvest date. Radioactivity recovered from the treated leaflet increased from 45 at 3 DAT to 70% at 14 DAT in both growth stages of dwarf burning bush. Ajuga and wintercreeper metabolized isoxaben faster than dwarf burning bush. There was no difference in the metabolism of isoxaben between the two growth stages of dwarf burning bush. Incorporation of glucose in the roots of wintercreeper and dwarf burning bush was not inhibited by isoxaben (1 mM). Approximately 10% inhibition of glucose incorporation by isoxaben was observed in the roots of the sensitive species ajuga. Ajuga absorbed more isoxaben than wintercreeper following root or shoot application, which may explain its greater sensitivity. Wintercreeper absorbed less isoxaben and metabolized more of this herbicide than dwarf burning bush, which may explain its greater tolerance. Absorption and metabolism of isoxaben following shoot application were similar in both growth stages of dwarf burning bush. More information is needed on target site sensitivity in these three species.

Uptake, Absorption, Translocation, Metabolism, Herbicide injury, Ornamentals

In 3 months.

Public URL:

List of attached files

File NameSize (Bytes)
phd.pdf78,637 Bytes
phd2.pdf13,548 Bytes
phd3.pdf267,409 Bytes
phd4.pdf4,664 Bytes
phd5.pdf1,948 Bytes

Date item approved:

Archiving fee received.
UMI fee received/NA.

[ETD main page] [Search ETDs][] [SCP home page] [library home page]

Send Suggestions or Comments to