Communications Project

Document Type:Dissertation
Name:Geoffrey Wadsworth Ringer
Title:Evaluation of Graft Pretension Effects in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Series of In Vitro and In Vivo Experiments
Degree:Doctor of Philosophy
Department:Engineering Mechanics
Committee Chair: Jennifer S. Wayne
Chair's email:
Committee Members:J. Wallace Grant, Co-Chair
Edmund G. Henneke
Ronald W. Landgraf
Wilhelm A. Zuelzer
Keywords:anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, knee kinematics, patellar tendon, porcine model, soft tissue mechanics, telemetry
Date of defense:January 23, 1998
Availability:Release the entire work for Virginia Tech access only.
After one year release worldwide only with written permission of the student and the advisory committee chair.


The purpose of this dissertation was to study the effects of graft pretension in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction through a series of experiments. First, an in vitro study of 5 human knees was conducted to determine if intact joint kinematics could be restored when using the ideal graft—the intrinsic ACL. The ACL tibial insertion site was freed, and pretensions of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 N were applied to the ligament using a custom designed load cell connection. Kinematics during a simulated active extension were compared to those of the intact knee. Intact knee kinematics were not restored. Pretensions that best restored tibial anterior/posterior translation and internal/external rotation ranged from 0-40 N. Furthermore, the pretensions that best restored these kinematic variables were widely disparate in two specimens. Second, the in vitro kinematics during a simulated active extension of human and porcine knees were compared and contrasted both prior to and following transection of the ACL. The ACL limited: (1) tibial anterior translation in both species, (2) tibial internal rotation in humans, and (3) tibial external rotation in pigs. Differences in kinematic patterns for tibial internal/external rotation and abduction/adduction between the species was explained by requirements for biped and quadruped stances. Third, the mechanical characteristics of porcine patellar tendon (PT) were investigated by uniaxial tensile testing at two strain rates. Patella-PT-tibia complexes from freshly sacrificed skeletally immature and mature animals were loaded to failure at elongation rates of 20 and 200 mm/min. Both strain rate and skeletal maturity significantly affected failure mode, tangent modulus, and ultimate stress of the tendons, and hence are important considerations in the mechanical evaluation of porcine PT. Fourth, ACL reconstructions were performed using pretensions of 10 or 20 N in an in vivo porcine model with a specially designed load cell/telemetry system to monitor graft load. Graft pretension was seen to increase during fixation with interference screws. Following sacrifice at 4 weeks, tissues were mechanically, histologically, and biochemically analyzed. A pretension of 20 N resulted in a tissue more similar to the intrinsic ACL.

List of Attached Files

appa.pdf ch1.pdf ch2.pdf
ch3.pdf ch4.pdf ch5.pdf
ch6.pdf etd.pdf f2_3_150.JPG
f2_3_300.JPG f2_3_75.JPG f2_4_150.JPG
f2_4_300.JPG f2_4_75.JPG f3_10_150.JPG
f3_10_300.JPG f3_10_75.JPG f3_11_150.JPG
f3_11_300.JPG f3_11_75.JPG f3_13_150.JPG
f3_13_300.JPG f3_13_75.JPG f3_14_150.JPG
f3_14_300.JPG f3_14_75.JPG f3_15_150.JPG
f3_15_300.JPG f3_15_600.JPG f3_16_150.JPG
f3_16_300.JPG f3_16_75.JPG f3_17_150.JPG
f3_17_300.JPG f3_17_75.JPG f3_18_150.JPG
f3_18_300.JPG f3_18_75.JPG f3_1_150.JPG
f3_1_300.JPG f3_1_75.JPG f3_2_150.JPG
f3_2_300.JPG f3_2_75.JPG f3_3_150.JPG
f3_3_300.JPG f3_3_75.JPG f3_4_150.JPG
f3_4_300.JPG f3_4_75.JPG f3_5_150.JPG
f3_5_300.JPG f3_5_75.JPG f3_6_150.JPG
f3_6_300.JPG f3_6_75.JPG f3_7_150.JPG
f3_7_300.JPG f3_7_75.JPG f3_8_150.JPG
f3_8_300.JPG f3_8_75.JPG f3_9_150.JPG
f3_9_300.JPG f3_9_75.JPG f4_1_1024.JPG
f4_1_256.JPG f4_1_512.JPG f4_2_1024.JPG
f4_2_256.JPG f4_2_512.JPG f4_3_1024.JPG
f4_3_256.JPG f4_3_512.JPG f5_10_150.JPG
f5_10_300.JPG f5_10_75.JPG f5_11_150.JPG
f5_11_300.JPG f5_11_75.JPG f5_12_150.JPG
f5_12_300.JPG f5_12_75.JPG f5_13_150.JPG
f5_13_300.JPG f5_13_75.JPG f5_14_150.JPG
f5_14_300.JPG f5_14_75.JPG f5_15_150.JPG
f5_15_300.JPG f5_15_75.JPG f5_16_150.JPG
f5_16_300.JPG f5_16_75.JPG f5_17_150.JPG
f5_17_300.JPG f5_17_75.JPG f5_18_150.JPG
f5_18_300.JPG f5_18_75.JPG f5_19_150.JPG
f5_19_300.JPG f5_19_75.JPG f5_20_150.JPG
f5_20_300.JPG f5_20_75.JPG f5_21_150.JPG
f5_21_300.JPG f5_21_600.JPG f5_22_150.JPG
f5_22_300.JPG f5_22_75.JPG f5_23_150.JPG
f5_23_300.JPG f5_23_75.JPG f5_24_150.JPG
f5_24_300.JPG f5_24_75.JPG f5_25_150.JPG
f5_25_300.JPG f5_25_75.JPG f5_26_150.JPG
f5_26_300.JPG f5_26_75.JPG f5_27_1024.jpg
f5_27_256.jpg f5_27_512.jpg f5_28_150.JPG
f5_28_300.JPG f5_28_75.JPG f5_29_150.JPG
f5_29_300.JPG f5_29_75.JPG f5_2_150.JPG
f5_2_300.JPG f5_2_75.JPG f5_30_150.JPG
f5_30_300.JPG f5_30_75.JPG f5_31_150.JPG
f5_31_300.JPG f5_31_75.JPG f5_38_1024.JPG
f5_38_256.JPG f5_38_512.JPG f5_39_150.JPG
f5_39_300.JPG f5_39_75.JPG f5_3_150.JPG
f5_3_300.JPG f5_3_75.JPG f5_41_150.JPG
f5_41_300.JPG f5_41_600.JPG f5_42_150.JPG
f5_42_300.JPG f5_42_75.JPG f5_44_150.JPG
f5_44_300.JPG f5_44_75.JPG f5_45_150.JPG
f5_45_300.JPG f5_45_75.JPG f5_46_150.JPG
f5_46_300.JPG f5_46_75.JPG f5_47_150.JPG
f5_47_300.JPG f5_47_75.JPG f5_48_150.JPG
f5_48_300.JPG f5_48_75.JPG f5_49_150.JPG
f5_49_300.JPG f5_49_75.JPG f5_4_150.JPG
f5_4_300.JPG f5_4_75.JPG f5_50_150.JPG
f5_50_300.JPG f5_50_75.JPG f5_51_150.JPG
f5_51_300.JPG f5_51_75.JPG f5_5_150.JPG
f5_5_300.JPG f5_5_75.JPG f5_6_150.JPG
f5_6_300.JPG f5_6_75.JPG f5_7_150.JPG
f5_7_300.JPG f5_7_75.JPG f5_8_150.JPG
f5_8_300.JPG f5_8_75.JPG f5_9_150.JPG
f5_9_300.JPG f5_9_75.JPG refs.pdf

At the author's request, all materials (PDF files, images, etc.) associated with this ETD are accessible from the Virginia Tech network only.

The author grants to Virginia Tech or its agents the right to archive and display their thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University Libraries in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. The author retains all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. The author also retains the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.